A low-risk internal summary may need sampling review, not approval.
Sampling can provide evidence without making every low-risk action wait.
AI governance
AI work should require human approval when consequence, irreversibility, low confidence, policy judgment, or accountability requires a person with authority to review, approve, escalate, or stop the action.
Direct answer
Teams add a person-in-the-loop because it sounds safe, then discover that no one knows what the person is approving, when the action should route to review, or when the work must stop.
Practical framework
Examples
Sampling can provide evidence without making every low-risk action wait.
Approval is justified when the human can change the outcome and leave a record.
Decision criteria
Common errors
Sources and related content
This framework is based on Christopher Petrino's product, data, AI, and technology operating experience.
When should AI work require human approval?
Read related writingBuild approval gates into one workflow
View the offerInspect the artifacts behind a credible AI release.
View the evidenceEmail Christopher
Tell Christopher what you are trying to decide, own, build, evaluate, or unblock.