A claims-like summary may pass routine cases while failing sensitive or ambiguous cases.
The decision turns on ownership, evidence, consequence, and the conditions for release.
AI evaluation
An AI workflow should be tested against the work it is meant to perform, the failures that matter, the policies it must respect, the tools it may use, and the escalation behavior required before release.
Direct answer
A demo can look useful while the workflow still fails under realistic inputs, edge cases, policy constraints, tool boundaries, or regression after changes.
Practical framework
Examples
The decision turns on ownership, evidence, consequence, and the conditions for release.
The decision turns on ownership, evidence, consequence, and the conditions for release.
Decision criteria
Common errors
Sources and related content
This framework is based on Christopher Petrino's product, data, AI, and technology operating experience.
How should an AI workflow be tested before release?
Read related writingTest one workflow before release
View the offerInspect the artifacts behind a credible AI release.
View the evidenceEmail Christopher
Tell Christopher what you are trying to decide, own, build, evaluate, or unblock.